10 Dec 2018

DO NOT FILE YOUR CANNABIS TRADE MARKS…YET:


The Constitutional Court judgment which decriminalises the private use of cannabis has also resulted in an emotional high for a lot of South Africans.

As predicted, this has placed a lot of existing and potential companies on the frontline wanting to create a brand for their business in order to grow and distribute cannabis in South Africa. Unfortunately, the high of these businesses need to ‘hog’ their plans for their trade mark applications for their brands – but possibly not for long.

The reason why these companies should hold off on their trade mark application for now is because of the fact that only ‘private’ use of cannabis has been decriminalised in the Constitutional Court judgment. Thus, the sale and distribution of cannabis is still very much illegal and a criminal offence in South Africa.

The function of a trade mark is clear, and in short it can be defined as a mark which represents the origin of the goods or services for the purpose of indicating that they are the goods of the proprietor of such a mark by virtue of the manufacture and/or dealing in such goods or services.

Since ‘dealing’ in cannabis is still an offence, the trade marks that will be filed for cannabis and the cultivating and distribution thereof will be void and without commercial value as this new trade mark will not be able to fulfil its main function as a badge of origin. Such a trade mark application will also be contrary to law – which is a bar to trade mark registration.

Our advice is to wait and see what the amended laws in respect of cannabis will be in their finalised form before considering conducting business and applying for a cannabis based trade mark as this can result in wasted costs.

Please do not hesitate to contact us in the event that you need any further trade mark advice.

Share this article

Send an Enquiry

Other articles you may be interested in:

WHO'S THE CHIEF? NEW ZEALAND RUGBY, THE NRL AND THE BATTLE OVER A TEAM NAME

A team name can be worth as much as the team itself. That is the premise of New Zealand Rugby's (NZR) new High Court action against....


14 Oct 2026

REBRANDING AN ESTABLISHED BUSINESS: WHEN A NEW BRAND INHERITS DECADES OF COMMERCIAL SUCCESS

The recent announcement that South Ocean Holdings is changing its name to Cables 4 Africa Holdings is an interesting reminder that....


14 Oct 2026

THE DIVINE PONYTAIL (NO, NOT THAT ONE): HAALAND, NORWEGIAN AIR AND THE VALUE OF AN ATHLETE'S IDENTITY.

An athlete's identity is a commercial asset, and the law increasingly treats it that way. The latest reminder comes from Norway, where Manchester City striker Erling Haaland....


08 Oct 2026

APPLE VS TACTION | SMALL COMPONENT S, SUBSTANTIAL PATENT RISKS

The vibration that signals an incoming message or confirms a payment is a small part of our smartphone experience. Yet the....


07 Oct 2026