09 May 2018

NEW EXPEDITED/DELAYED EXAMINATION PROVISIONS IN ARIPO


Effective from 1 January 2018, expedited/delayed examination may be requested for ARIPO applications. ARIPO (The Administrative Council of the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization) has adopted new amendments to the Harare Protocol and its regulations, which may prove useful to applicants.

The new amendments relate to Rule 18, which gives effect to section 3(3) of the Protocol and deals with substantive examination of patents. On 1 January 2017, ARIPO introduced a new procedural step requiring an applicant to request substantive examination of patent applications which had, up to that point, been examined automatically. This means that substantive examination of patent applications must be requested within three years of the filing date of the patent application, otherwise the application will lapse. A new Rule 18(7) enables an applicant to request expedited/delayed examination of any application.

The following requirements must be met before a request for expedited/delayed examination will be considered by the ARIPO office:

A request for expedited examination may be filed at the ARIPO Office, provided:

  • a request for substantive examination has been filed;
  • the application relates to a single invention and/or the applicant agrees to the examining division only considering the first identified invention;
  • the applicant agrees to respond immediately to any clarifications sought by the examining division;
  • the application does not become abandoned and reinstated before the conclusion of the examination; and
  • a search report is provided based on claims corresponding to the claims of the ARIPO application and which is either of the same scope or narrower in scope than the claims in the ARIPO application.

A request for delayed examination may be filed at the ARIPO Office, provided:

  • a request for substantive examination has been filed;
  • a written explanation providing the reason behind the request is submitted with the request; and
  • the application does not lapse due to non-payment of formalities.

KISCH IP’s experienced attorneys specialize in the preparation and prosecution of ARIPO applications and are qualified to provide technical advice and expertise unique to each application.

Share this article

Send an Enquiry

Other articles you may be interested in:

WHO'S THE CHIEF? NEW ZEALAND RUGBY, THE NRL AND THE BATTLE OVER A TEAM NAME

A team name can be worth as much as the team itself. That is the premise of New Zealand Rugby's (NZR) new High Court action against....


14 Oct 2026

REBRANDING AN ESTABLISHED BUSINESS: WHEN A NEW BRAND INHERITS DECADES OF COMMERCIAL SUCCESS

The recent announcement that South Ocean Holdings is changing its name to Cables 4 Africa Holdings is an interesting reminder that....


14 Oct 2026

THE DIVINE PONYTAIL (NO, NOT THAT ONE): HAALAND, NORWEGIAN AIR AND THE VALUE OF AN ATHLETE'S IDENTITY.

An athlete's identity is a commercial asset, and the law increasingly treats it that way. The latest reminder comes from Norway, where Manchester City striker Erling Haaland....


08 Oct 2026

APPLE VS TACTION | SMALL COMPONENT S, SUBSTANTIAL PATENT RISKS

The vibration that signals an incoming message or confirms a payment is a small part of our smartphone experience. Yet the....


07 Oct 2026