05 Oct 2022

MODERNA SUING PFIZER, AND BIONTECH – THE WHY, WHERE, WHAT AND LESSONS TO BE LEARNT


On Friday, 26 August 2022, Moderna announced that it is suing Pfizer and BioNTech for alleged patent infringement of its mRNA vaccine technology. On the same day, BioNTech published the following statement on its website: “BioNTech is aware of reports that Moderna has sued Pfizer and BioNTech, alleging that COMIRNATY® infringes certain Moderna patents. BioNTech's work is original, and we will vigorously defend against all allegations of patent infringement.”

Why Moderna is suing Pfizer and BioNTech

In October 2020, Moderna pledged not to enforce its COVID-19-related patents while the pandemic continued. However, according to Moderna, in March 2022, the collective fight against COVID-19 entered a new phase and vaccine supply is no longer a barrier to access in many parts of the world.

Moderna’s chief executive officer Stephane Bancel states, "We are filing these lawsuits to protect the innovative mRNA technology platform that we pioneered, invested billions of dollars in creating, and patented during the decade preceding the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Moderna’s Chief Legal Officer Shannon Thyme Klinger said: "We believe that Pfizer and BioNTech unlawfully copied Moderna's inventions, and they have continued to use them without permission."

In which countries Moderna has instituted proceedings against Pfizer

On 26 August 2022, Moderna filed patent infringement lawsuits against Pfizer and BioNTech in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and the Regional Court of Düsseldorf in Germany.

Moderna’s above statement has made it clear that it would never enforce its patents for any COVID-19 vaccine used in the 92 low- and middle-income countries in the GAVI COVAX Advance Market Commitment (AMC 92).

What is Moderna claiming from Pfizer and BioNTech?

Moderna is seeking unspecified damages in both the United States and Germany. More specifically, in the United States, Moderna is seeking damages for revenue that Pfizer and BioNTech derived from sales in the United States (that are not subject to 28 U.S.C. § 1498) and from its domestic manufacture for supply to countries outside the United States. Moderna is not seeking damages for activities occurring before 8 March 2022.

What can be learnt from this?

First, before you start manufacturing something new, it is advisable to consult a patent attorney to assist you with determining if there are any existing intellectual property (IP) rights which may stand in your way. 

Secondly, if any IP rights cover your new product, enter into a written agreement with the IP rights holder.

Share this article

Send an Enquiry

Other articles you may be interested in:

WHO'S THE CHIEF? NEW ZEALAND RUGBY, THE NRL AND THE BATTLE OVER A TEAM NAME

A team name can be worth as much as the team itself. That is the premise of New Zealand Rugby's (NZR) new High Court action against....


14 Oct 2026

REBRANDING AN ESTABLISHED BUSINESS: WHEN A NEW BRAND INHERITS DECADES OF COMMERCIAL SUCCESS

The recent announcement that South Ocean Holdings is changing its name to Cables 4 Africa Holdings is an interesting reminder that....


14 Oct 2026

THE DIVINE PONYTAIL (NO, NOT THAT ONE): HAALAND, NORWEGIAN AIR AND THE VALUE OF AN ATHLETE'S IDENTITY.

An athlete's identity is a commercial asset, and the law increasingly treats it that way. The latest reminder comes from Norway, where Manchester City striker Erling Haaland....


08 Oct 2026

APPLE VS TACTION | SMALL COMPONENT S, SUBSTANTIAL PATENT RISKS

The vibration that signals an incoming message or confirms a payment is a small part of our smartphone experience. Yet the....


07 Oct 2026