01 Oct 2021

IT IS COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND THE MET GALA


The Copyright Laws of many countries, including the United States of America and South Africa provide that in order for a work to be afforded copyright protection, it must be original in nature (in that sufficient skill and labour was expended by the author in creating the work) and reduced to a material form, among other requirements. Copyright protection extends to many different works including artistic works such as paintings, sculptures, drawings, photographs and even prints or patterns appearing on textiles and clothing. Infringement of copyright can occur when someone copies, reproduces or makes an adaptation of a protected work without permission from the copyright owner.

The annual Met Gala event, where many celebrities in the entertainment industry meet annually to raise funds for the Costume Institute is no stranger to being at the forefront of an allegation of copyright infringement. The event is characterised by celebrities dressed in luxurious and extravagant outfits and/or designer clothing in order to stand out. In 2016, street artist Joseph Tierney brought an action of copyright infringement against Katy Perry’s designer as he believed that a dress worn by her at the Met Gala, was a reproduction of one of his street graffiti paintings and therefore infringed on the copyright that subsisted in that work. The case was heard in the California District court and the court held that Joseph Tierney had valid grounds for an action of infringement. However, the matter was ultimately settled between the parties. The full court case can be accessed at https://www.manatt.com/uploadedFiles/Content/4_News_and_Events/Newsletters/IPandInternetLaw@manatt/Tierney-Moschino-ruling.pdf.

Designers ought to be cautioned against reproducing or copying works which enjoy copyright protection, such as graffiti paintings. As witnessed in the US District Court in 2018, Judge Frederick Block upheld a claim for damages arising from the infringement of graffiti paintings of up to $6.75 million. The full case can be accessed at https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nyed.370997/gov.uscourts.nyed.370997.69.0.pdf.

The above shows that there is a fine line between drawing inspiration from existing works and copying, reproducing or adapting those existing (and potentially protected) works in new works. If that fine line is crossed, infringers could face large financial repercussions, amongst others.  It is vital that designers (and authors of creative and original works alike), ensure that they are not overstepping the line into the realm of copyright infringement. We wait with bated breath to see if any infringement claims arise out of the most recent Met Gala.

Share this article

Send an Enquiry

Liani Taljaard
Director
Attorney

Trade Mark Practitioner

Other articles you may be interested in:

WHO'S THE CHIEF? NEW ZEALAND RUGBY, THE NRL AND THE BATTLE OVER A TEAM NAME

A team name can be worth as much as the team itself. That is the premise of New Zealand Rugby's (NZR) new High Court action against....


14 Oct 2026

REBRANDING AN ESTABLISHED BUSINESS: WHEN A NEW BRAND INHERITS DECADES OF COMMERCIAL SUCCESS

The recent announcement that South Ocean Holdings is changing its name to Cables 4 Africa Holdings is an interesting reminder that....


14 Oct 2026

THE DIVINE PONYTAIL (NO, NOT THAT ONE): HAALAND, NORWEGIAN AIR AND THE VALUE OF AN ATHLETE'S IDENTITY.

An athlete's identity is a commercial asset, and the law increasingly treats it that way. The latest reminder comes from Norway, where Manchester City striker Erling Haaland....


08 Oct 2026

APPLE VS TACTION | SMALL COMPONENT S, SUBSTANTIAL PATENT RISKS

The vibration that signals an incoming message or confirms a payment is a small part of our smartphone experience. Yet the....


07 Oct 2026